Am I Entitled to the Federal Tax Deduction for Child Support?

Divorce proceedings involve numerous financial aspects, including the determination of who gets the right to claim tax deductions related to children. While IRS regulations have clear stipulations regarding the child tax deduction, recent practices in New York courts have introduced complexities that might affect divorced parents during tax season.

IRS Regulations on Child Tax Deductions

According to IRS regulations, the non-custodial parent is entitled to claim the child tax deduction only if they receive written permission from the custodial parent. This permission typically comes in the form of IRS Form 8332, Release/Revocation of Release of Claim to Exemption for Child by Custodial Parent. This form allows the custodial parent to transfer the tax exemption to the non-custodial parent, reflecting an agreement often made during divorce proceedings.

New York Courts and Child Tax Deductions

Despite the clarity provided by IRS rules, some judges in New York have begun to award the tax deduction to non-custodial parents as part of divorce settlements. This practice raises questions about the enforceability of such decisions, especially under IRS scrutiny. “While judges may decree the non-custodial parent can claim the deduction, it’s essential to understand that this might not align with federal tax requirements,” states a legal expert.

The Power of Trial Judges

In some instances, trial judges in New York have ordered custodial parents to provide written consent, allowing the non-custodial parent to claim the child tax deduction. This judicial intervention aims to balance the financial responsibilities and benefits between parents post-divorce. However, whether these orders hold up under an IRS audit remains uncertain.

Potential IRS Audit Concerns

The discrepancy between state court orders and federal tax law can lead to complications if audited by the IRS. An IRS audit may disregard the state court’s decree if the custodial parent did not voluntarily sign Form 8332. This situation can result in tax liabilities and penalties for the non-custodial parent who claimed the deduction without proper authorization according to IRS standards.

Best Practices for Divorced Parents

To navigate these complexities, divorced parents should consider the following steps:

  1. Obtain Clear Documentation: If a judge awards the deduction to the non-custodial parent, ensure that this decision is documented clearly and explicitly in the divorce decree.
  2. Secure Form 8332: Regardless of the divorce decree, the non-custodial parent should obtain a signed Form 8332 from the custodial parent to avoid any issues with the IRS.
  3. Consult a Tax Professional: Given the potential for legal and financial complications, consulting with a tax professional who understands the intersection of tax law and family law is crucial.
  4. Legal Advice: Work closely with your divorce attorney to understand how the court’s decisions regarding tax deductions might impact your overall financial situation post-divorce.

The Case of John Pachomski versus Karen M. Pachomski

In the legal battle of John Pachomski versus Karen M. Pachomski, the complexities of divorce and ancillary relief are brought to the forefront in a case handled by the Supreme Court of Suffolk County, presided over by Judge Baisley Jr. This case, decided on February 15, 2005, navigates through the financial and custodial nuances typically encountered in divorce proceedings.

Key Financial Decisions

John Pachomski, the plaintiff, was initially awarded $80,082.35, representing 50% of Karen M. Pachomski’s enhanced earnings capacity as a licensed teacher. This decision was based on the recognition that her increased earning potential, attributed to her professional development during the marriage, provided financial benefits that were subject to division upon divorce.

Additionally, the court addressed the allocation of rental income from an apartment within the marital residence. John Pachomski was awarded credits of $1,200 for past rental income and a monthly sum of $400 for future rental income beginning in November 2002. These financial decisions reflect the court’s approach to fairly distributing assets and ongoing income derived from marital property.

Custody and Tax Exemptions

A significant part of the ruling also involved the custodial arrangements for the couple’s children. The court permitted John Pachomski to claim federal and state tax dependency exemptions for the parties’ older child in odd years and their younger child in even years. This decision aligns with the court’s intent to balance parental responsibilities and benefits, recognizing that both parents contribute financially to their children’s upbringing.

Appellate Modifications

Upon appeal, the judgment underwent critical modifications. The appellate division, led by Justices Santucci, Krausman, Mastro, and Skelos, found that the original award concerning Karen’s enhanced earnings and the handling of rental incomes needed reassessment. The appellate court removed the award of $80,082.35 and adjusted the terms related to rental income. It was decreed that John Pachomski would only receive the $400 monthly credit for future rental income for months the apartment was rented, and only until the marital residence was sold.

Furthermore, the appellate court mandated a reevaluation of the division of Karen’s enhanced earnings capacity as a teacher, acknowledging that while her licensure was attained during the marriage, the contributions were not solely marital but also individual.

Legal and Personal Implications

This case highlights the intricate interplay between individual efforts and marital contributions in assessing asset division during divorce proceedings. It also underscores the legal complexities when evaluating professional growth and its financial ramifications within a marriage.

Hiring a Brooklyn Divorce Attorney

Navigating child tax deductions as a non-custodial parent in New York can be fraught with legal and financial pitfalls. While New York courts may provide for certain arrangements in divorce decrees, aligning these with IRS regulations is essential to avoid future complications. Divorced parents should ensure they are fully informed and compliant with both state and federal laws when claiming such deductions.

Need Help? If you are dealing with complexities related to child tax deductions post-divorce, consider seeking guidance from a knowledgeable attorney who specializes in divorce and tax issues. Ensuring compliance with both court orders and IRS regulations is key to maintaining financial stability and legal integrity.

Contact us at 877-826-7257 today to get expert-guided legal representation.

Scroll to Top