New York Divorce Lawyer
New York City Divorce Attorney Why Us Firm Overview Attorney Profile FAQ Client Reviews Contact Us
Divorce Strategy What to Expect Judge's Corner Divorce Forms Changing Your Lawyer Online Case Evaluation
Divorce
Contested Divorce
Uncontested Divorces
Business Asset Division
Child Custody
Child Support
Child Visitation
Domestic Violence
Enforcement of Orders
Equitable Distribution
Fathers Rights
Gay and Lesbian Divorce
Grandparental Rights
High Net Worth Cases
Mediation
Military Divorce
Modifications
Orders of Protection
Parental Alienation
Prenuptial Agreements
Relocation
Spousal Support
Visitation Cases
Womens' Rights
Write a Review
380 Lexington Avenue, 17th Floor; New York, New York 10168
Social Networking
Click here for an instant call back from our office. Email Us Family Law Blog

Enhanced Earnings

  Just because a license or a degree is acquired during the marriage, it does not mean that a Judge has to divide the assets.  In the following divorce case in New York the appellate division reversed the trial judge.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

 

Dawn HIGGINS, appellant,

v.

Davis HIGGINS, respondent.

 

Apr. 15, 2008

 

 

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from (1) stated portions of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Horowitz, J .), dated July 28, 2006, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded the defendant 30% of her enhanced earnings, and failed to direct the sale of the marital residence, and (2) stated portions of findings of facts and conclusions of law of the same court also dated July 28, 2006.

 

ORDERED that the appeal from the findings of fact and conclusions of law is dismissed, as findings of fact and conclusions of law are not separately appealable (see Matter of County of Westchester v. O'Neill, 191 A.D.2d 556); and it is further,

 

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting the provisions thereof (1) awarding the defendant a 30% credit for his equitable share of the plaintiff's enhanced earnings resulting from her Bachelor's Degree and Master's Degree valued at $306,000 as credited against the plaintiff's share of the marital residence, (2) awarding the defendant a credit for one half of the payments he made on a loan against his Ford Motor Company Savings Plan, (3) awarding the defendant a credit for payments of the mortgage, taxes, homeowner's insurance, and other expenses connected with the marital residence, (4) awarding the plaintiff child support, (5) fixing child support arrears, and (6) awarding the plaintiff child care expenses; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for a determination of the husband's income, and a recalculation of child care expenses, child support, and child support arrears, taking into account any credit due for amounts paid by the husband pursuant to the pendente lite order.




It is important to hire a lawyer who stays up to date on the latest developments in the law. For further information about The Law Offices of Brian D. Perskin please click here.


 

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Address: 44 Court Street, Suite 1210, Brooklyn, New York 11201 Phone: 718-875-7584
Address: 380 Lexington Avenue, 17th Floor New York, New York 10168 Phone: 212- 355-0887